![]() AMD Zen 5 Microarchitecture Referenced in Leaked Slides.Aug 16th, 2023 Upcoming Hardware Launches 2023 (Updated Aug 2023).Sep 26th, 2023 Beelink SER7 7840HS Mini-PC Review.Oct 9th, 2023 Corsair Dominator Titanium DDR5-7200 2x 24 GB Review - First Edition.Oct 6th, 2023 Assassin's Creed Mirage Performance Benchmark Review - 30 GPUs Tested.Sep 21st, 2023 NVIDIA DLSS 3.5 Ray Reconstruction Review - Better Than Native.Oct 5th, 2023 Sparkle Arc A750 Titan OC Review.Sep 20th, 2023 Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty Benchmark Performance Review - 25+ GPUs Tested.Sep 19th, 2023 ASUS GeForce RTX 4090 Matrix Platinum Review - The RTX 4090 Ti.Sep 29th, 2023 Counter-Strike 2 Performance Benchmark Review - 40 GPUs Tested.Sep 19th, 2023 Intel Meteor Lake Technical Deep Dive.Posted on May 22nd 2023, 1:19 Reply #20 Synthwave Sometime after the first 3 years of production they changed something that increased the force required to actuate M1 and M2. I also wish they'd bring back the lighter clicking earlier version of the G305. ![]() I just wish there were more mice (or a newer version of) the G305. ![]() Ultimately shape is the most important factor for any mouse and how it feels to you. The sensor can't track quite as well as newer sensors but that's not a problem in most cases. The side buttons, which don't matter as much, don't quite fair as well. The G305 is indeed fairly competitive with more modern mice, at least in regards to M1 and M2, which have very little pre-travel. I think the latency is actually fairly competitive for a 1000hz wireless mouse.Top gaming mice shave off about 1.6ms of click latency at the same 1000 Hz polling rate (mostly from improvements to the switch de-bounce, pre-travel, ect. I also personally don't mind a heavy mouse at all, so. R-T-BDon't and have never thought 4k or 8k were worth the added CPU usage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |